Strategic Leadership
Four Decisions That Show What It Is, and What It Costs

The key insight:

A strategic thinker sees the choice. A strategic leader makes it, pays for it and is still holding the line two bad quarters later.

Strategic leadership is setting an organisation's direction, choosing what it will not do and holding a senior team to that choice, including when results are poor. It is easiest to see in decisions, so this guide starts with four, then sets out the behaviours behind them and a way to check your own profile. It is about leading an organisation. If you want the personal skill of analysing a situation, see strategic thinking skills, which is a separate question.

Four decisions that show strategic leadership

The four cases below are composite illustrations of patterns we see across executive search mandates, not named companies. In each one the leader gave something up. That is the test: a strategy that costs nothing is a plan, not a choice.

What the four have in common

None of the four was a failure of analysis. Every leader knew the answer well before they acted. What they did differently from a strategic thinker was to make the choice public, accept the named cost and then stay with it. The exit, the refusal and the sequencing all looked wrong for at least two quarters. The reorganisation looked wrong for longer. Strategic leadership is largely the ability to be misunderstood for a defined period without changing course for the wrong reasons.

What separates a strategic leader from a strategic thinker

There are four behaviours, and they are observable, which means you can check yourself against them.

Choosing. A strategic leader names what the organisation will stop doing and says it aloud. A common sign of its absence is a strategy document with eight priorities, none of which has a budget line removed to pay for it.

Aligning the top team. A direction is only real if the people who run the functions will defend it in rooms you are not in. That means testing the choice with each member of the senior team before announcing it, hearing the objection that is really about their own area and then asking for public agreement. A leader who accepts private nods and public silence has not aligned anyone.

Sustaining. The hardest period is not the decision but the second and third quarter after it, when the numbers have not yet moved and the pressure to hedge is highest. Sustaining means keeping the direction while changing the tactics, and being clear with the team about which is which.

Learning without drifting. Evidence will sometimes show the choice was wrong. A strategic leader updates the plan on evidence, not on discomfort, and can tell the two apart. Academic research on senior executives points the same way: in a widely cited update in the Academy of Management Review, Hambrick (2007) sets out that executives' experiences, values and personalities strongly shape how they interpret situations, and so the choices they make. In plain terms, who the leader is affects what the organisation does, which is why the profile of the person at the top is not a soft subject.

Public frameworks reflect the same split between seeing and doing. The NHS Leadership Academy's published leadership guidance lists nine dimensions, and they include both evaluating information and sharing the vision, alongside holding to account. The first is analysis. The second and third are the leadership work that follows it. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics describes the same division of labour in large organisations: chief executives typically focus on formulating policies and planning strategies, while other executives direct the day-to-day work that carries them out.

Where strategic leadership actually fails

Most people assume strategic leadership fails on vision. In our experience it fails more often on two other dimensions.

Execution Drive. A leader with a clear direction and weak follow-through produces a strategy that is announced, applauded and quietly abandoned. The signs are familiar: a launch event with no owner named for each commitment, and a review meeting in which the same milestone slips for the third time.

Composure. A leader with strong vision and low composure under pressure tends to hedge at exactly the moment the strategy needs to be defended. Bad quarters are when composure is tested, and it shows in whether the direction survives them.

Influencing Power matters too, because alignment is an act of influence, and People Intelligence decides whether the leader hears the objection that is really about someone's role. Vision Thinking is the dimension people expect to matter most. It is necessary, but it is rarely the one that fails. The longer discussion of how composure and influence behave when the organisation is moving is in our guide to leading through change.

Some roles make this more visible than others. In a group structure the leader is often choosing between businesses rather than within one, and JOH Partners' view of running a portfolio rather than a company is a useful example of how the same skill changes shape with the role.

A self-check before you go for the bigger role

Before you move toward the chief executive route or a board role, two questions are worth asking honestly. First, which choice in your remit have you deferred because it would cost something? Second, which of your five dimensions is most likely to undo you when the numbers go wrong?

The Leadership Psychometric answers the second question with data rather than opinion. It is a 50-question leadership profile built by executive recruiters, scored across Vision Thinking, Execution Drive, Influencing Power, People Intelligence and Composure. It takes 10 to 15 minutes, and you can take the free Leadership Psychometric to see your own profile. If you would like to see what the profile covers first, the Leadership Psychometric overview sets out the five dimensions.

A profile is not a verdict. It is a forward-looking read of where you are likely to be strong and where you are likely to struggle, which is the opposite of a CV, which looks back. For someone aiming at the next level, that is the more useful document.

Building the habit

If you want to practise rather than only read, three steps are enough to start.

1. Write down the one decision you have been deferring, and the specific cost of making it.
2. Decide it with a stated trade-off, and tell your team what you are stopping as well as what you are starting.
3. Choose one weakness from your profile, most often composure or follow-through, and attach a specific habit to it, such as a fixed review date for each commitment.

The competencies a panel looks for at the next level overlap with these, and our guide to leadership competencies shows how they are usually grouped. If your target is the top role, how to become a CEO sets out the routes, and for those considering a board role, the non-executive director guide covers how boards test strategic judgement. The pay that goes with the strategy role is covered in chief strategy officer salary. Leading the team that carries the strategy out is a separate skill, covered in team leadership.

Key takeaways

• Strategic leadership is setting direction, choosing what the organisation will not do and holding the top team to the choice, including through bad quarters.
• It differs from strategic thinking. Thinking sees the options; leadership picks one, pays for it and sustains it.
• Four behaviours matter: choosing, aligning the top team, sustaining and learning without drifting.
• It fails more often on Execution Drive and Composure than on Vision Thinking.
• A 50-question leadership profile shows which dimension is most likely to undo you before the situation tests it.

For more on leadership, see the full Leadership collection.

JOH Partners Intelligence

Get the fortnightly brief on GCC careers, salaries, and market moves.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.