How to Become a CEO
The Four Routes, What Boards Test and the Gaps That Rule People Out

The key insight:

Nobody is made chief executive for being the best at their function. They are chosen because a board can picture them holding the whole company, and that picture is built years before the vacancy.

Most people who end up as chief executive did not plan the whole route. They took a larger scope each time it was offered, learned to run people who were senior to them, and arrived at the point where a board could picture them holding the entire company. This guide is for the COO, CFO, divisional managing director or functional head who could plausibly be a candidate within five years, and who wants to know what the route actually looks like and what to fix first.

The case for taking it seriously is simple. A CV records what you have done. A chief executive appointment is a bet on what you will do, so the evidence that matters is forward looking: how you lead, where you are thin and what you are doing about it. If you want that outside view early, you can take the free Leadership Psychometric, a 50-question leadership profile scoring five dimensions, before anyone else makes the comparison for you.

The four routes into the chief executive seat

Boards appoint from four directions. Each has a strength to lean on and a gap to close.

No route is easier. The operating route is the most common in large organisations because it carries the broadest evidence of running a business, but boards do appoint from finance and commercial seats when the business needs what those seats prove. If you are choosing between a lateral move and a vertical one on the way, our guide to career progression after manager level sets out the four routes at a lower altitude, and how to get promoted covers the internal process. The finance route to the top is covered in how to become a CFO.

What a board tests when it chooses one

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics lists five years or more of work experience in a related occupation as typical for top executives, and notes that many top executives advance within their own organisations. That is the floor. What a board adds on top of it is a judgement about four things.

Scope. Have you owned a full profit and loss, with revenue, cost and capital all landing on you? A function that reports into someone else's P&L is not the same evidence.

Range. Can you lead people who know more than you about their own area? A chief executive does not out-specialise the team. They choose, align and hold the team to account.

Judgement under uncertainty. Boards look for decisions made on incomplete information and what you learned when they went wrong.

Fit with the board itself. Can you work with a chair, a senior independent director and a committee structure, and be trusted with the information those people need?

Research on how executives are assessed points the same way. Economists Steven Kaplan and Morten Sorensen analysed more than 2,600 assessments of executive candidates for top posts, scoring thirty traits and grouping them into four factors: general ability, execution versus interpersonal skill, charisma versus analytical ability, and strategic versus managerial orientation. They found that profiles differ by the role being filled and that the scores predict who goes on to become chief executive. The lesson for a candidate is that a board is reading a profile, not a list of jobs, and the profile is what you can work on.

The gaps that most often rule people out

Four gaps account for most of the strong candidates who are passed over.

1. No full P&L. The commonest gap in finance, HR, legal and technology careers. Fix it by moving into a role with a revenue or margin line, even a smaller one, before the vacancy.
2. No board exposure. Presenting to the board twice a year is not the same as sitting in the discussion. Ask to lead a committee paper, join a subsidiary board or take a non-executive seat outside your employer.
3. No hard assignment. A turnaround, an integration, a scale-up or a market entry gives a board a story about how you behave when things are not going to plan.
4. An unexamined leadership profile. Many candidates know their technical record far better than they know how others experience them. Our guide to leadership blind spots covers the patterns that are hardest to see from the inside, and our piece on influencing without authority at C-suite level covers the skill that decides most close calls. How you run the work day to day, and which style you fall back on under pressure, is covered in our guide to management styles.

A realistic timeline

There is no standard timeline, and a single figure would hide wide variation by sector and company size. A more useful way to plan is in scope steps. One typical sequence is a divisional P&L, then a group operating or financial seat that puts you in the room with the executive committee, then the top role. Each step tends to take three to five years, and the step that stalls most candidates is the middle one, because the seat is crowded and the boards watching it are comparing you with insiders and outsiders alike.

Two practical consequences follow. First, begin the work on the gaps three years before you want to be considered, not when the vacancy appears. Second, the people who decide are paying attention to your reputation as much as your results, so treat visible, repeatable behaviour as part of the plan. Our guide to COO pay and the shape of the role is useful if the operating route is yours.

Where are your gaps? Test them against evidence

Self-assessment at this altitude has a known problem: senior people tend to rate their strengths generously and miss the dimension that is thin. A structured profile gives you an outside view.

The Leadership Psychometric is a 50-question leadership profile across five dimensions:

• Vision Thinking: how naturally you set direction and see further than the current plan.
• Execution Drive: how reliably you turn direction into delivery.
• Influencing Power: how well you move people who do not report to you.
• People Intelligence: how accurately you read and develop others.
• Composure: how steady you are when the pressure is highest.

Read it as a map of where a board is most likely to probe, not as a score. Someone strong on Execution Drive and thin on Influencing Power knows what to build before a chair does the comparison. The profile requires a free account, so create one and take the free Leadership Psychometric. If you would like to see what it covers first, the public overview page sets it out.

A note on the Gulf

In the Gulf, the route to the top seat often runs through two kinds of organisation that behave differently from a listed company: government-related entities and family groups. At a government-related entity, the appointment tends to involve a board and a sponsor, and the weight falls on delivery of national or strategic mandates and on relationships you have built over years. At a family group, the question is usually whether you can hold authority alongside an owner, a chair or a founder who is still engaged. JOH Partners writes about how that works in practice, including the conditions under which an executive chairman and a professional chief executive share a Gulf family group, where a written split of authority and an end date are what keep the arrangement working.

If you want to see what the top seat pays in the region, our benchmark of chief executive pay in Dubai and the UAE is built from JOH Partners search mandates, and the wider Career Strategy collection covers the route in more detail.

Key takeaways

• There are four routes to the chief executive seat: operating, financial, commercial and founder. Each proves something and leaves a gap.
• Boards test scope, range, judgement under uncertainty and fit with the board. The usual floor is five years or more of related experience.
• The four most common gaps are no full P&L, no board exposure, no hard assignment and an unexamined leadership profile.
• Plan in scope steps, and start working on the gaps three years before you want to be considered.
• Test your self-view against an outside source. The free Leadership Psychometric is a 50-question profile across Vision Thinking, Execution Drive, Influencing Power, People Intelligence and Composure.

JOH Partners Intelligence

Get the fortnightly brief on GCC careers, salaries, and market moves.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.